Supervising Partner

 

Hamish Carlyle

Partner
Office (07) 3009 8444

e: h.carlyle@rostroncarlyle.com

 

Lawyers

 

Jeremy Streten

Senior Associate
Office: (07) 3009 8444
e: j.streten@rostroncarlyle.com

 

Elicia Lin

Solicitor

Office: (07) 3009 8444

e: e.lin@rostroncarlyle.com

 

Conveyancing Paralegal

 

Barbara Conway

Conveyanging Paralegal

Office: (07) 3009 8444

e: b.conway@rostroncarlyle.com

 

Contact us

 

Brisbane - Head Office

Level 6, 232 Adelaide Street
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
E -mail: mail@rostroncarlyle.com
Phone: (07) 3009 8444
Fax: (07) 3009 8499

FREE CALL 1800 198 276

Postal Address:
GPO Box 3203
Brisbane Qld 4001

Changes to off-the-plan unit contracts

Publications > Changes to off-the-plan unit contracts

24 June 2009

 

The Queensland Government has reacted quickly to the decision of Bossichix Pty Ltd v Martinek Holdings Pty Ltd [2009] QCA 154 (Bossichix) by passing the Body Corporate and Community Management Amendment Bill 2009 to rectify an unintended consequence of the Body Corporate and Community Management Act 1997 (BCCMA). Bookmark and Share

Print this page

The decision of Bossichix

 

The decision of Bossichix highlighted the potential for many pending off-the-plan unit contracts to be at risk of cancellation because of a strict interpretation of the former s212 of the BCCMA.

 

The former s212 of the BCCMA provided that a buyer could cancel a contract for the purchase of a proposed lot in a community titles scheme if the contract did not provide that ‘settlement must not take place earlier than 14 days after the seller gives advice to the buyer that the scheme has been established or changed’.

 

Section 24 of the BCCMA provides that establishment of a community titles scheme occurs only when both the plan of subdivision is registered and the community management statement for the scheme is recorded.

 

In Bossichix, the Queensland Court of Appeal held that a contract providing for settlement to occur 14 days after notice to the buyer that the relevant plan of subdivision was registered was not sufficient to satisfy the former s 212 of the BCCMA as it did not refer to scheme establishment or the recording of the community management statement with the plan of subdivision.  Consequently, the buyer’s cancellation of the contract was upheld.

 

The intention of s 212 of the BCCMA was to provide consumer protection by setting out the pre-contract disclosure requirements for buyers of proposed lots in a community titles scheme. The Court of Appeal acknowledged that the purpose of s 212 of the BCCMA is to inform the buyer that the scheme has been established to allow sufficient time before settlement for the buyer to make any necessary searches and enquiries.

 

Amendments to the BCCMA

 

The new s 212 of the BCCMA provides further clarification to the requirements of a contract for settlement to take place by deeming the contract to contain the term, ‘providing that settlement must not take place earlier than 14 days after the seller gives advice to the buyer that the scheme has been established or changed’, even if the contract does not do so.

 

Further, a new s 362A of the BCCMA is inserted to provide for the new s 212 of the BCCMA to have retrospective affect to a contract whether entered into before or after 5 June 2009. This provision provides for the exclusion of contracts already settled, contract already cancelled before 5 June 2000 pursuant to the former s 212 of BCCMA and legal proceedings decided before the commencement of the amendments.

 

These amendments will ensure that contracts cannot be cancelled based on a mere technical breach (an omission of reference to the establishment of the community titles scheme).

 

Rostron Carlyle has expertise in preparing off-the-plan contracts for many clients. For any enquiries about off-the-plan contracts and compliance requirements, do not hesitate to contact us.

 

 

Elicia Lin  B.Bus.,LL.B.,GradDipLegalPrac.
Solicitor

 

"The information contained in this article isgeneral in nature and cannot be regarded as anything more than general comment. Readers of this article should not act on the basis of this comment without consulting one of Rostron Carlyle's legal practitioners who will consider their particular circumstances".

 

Expertise

 

Rostron Carlyle's lawyers have a wide range of experience assisting people to with the purchase and sale of residential property in Queensland.

 

Not only will you find that Rostron Carlyle is likely to have assisted someone in your exact situation, but you’ll find that a Rostron Carlyle lawyer can distill a complex legal issue into a set of actionable options for you to consider.

 

A Rostron Carlyle lawyer will be a person that you can relate to.  We'’ll talk your language. Most

importantly, a relationship with a Rostron Carlyle lawyer will be "a relationship you can rely on".

 

more legal services