

Supervising Partner
Greg Rostron 
Partner
Office: (07) 3009 8444
e: g.rostron@rostroncarlyle.com
Lawyers
Rostron Carlyle Solicitors
Contact us
Brisbane - Head Office
Level 15, 270 Adelaide Street
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
E -mail: mail@rostroncarlyle.com
Phone: (07) 3009 8444
Fax: (07) 3009 8499
FREE CALL 1800 198 276
Postal Address:
GPO Box 3203
Brisbane Qld 4001
Publications > The end of the golden handshake? - proposed changes to executive termination benefits
On 7 September 2009, the Senate Economics Legislation Committee released its Final report the Rudd Governments Corporations Amendment (Improving Accountability on Termination Payments) Bill 2009 (Bill) aimed at reducing excessive executive termination benefits.
|
|
The current law relating to executive termination payments
Section 200B of the Act currently provides for termination benefits of up to 7 times an executive's total annual remuneration. Above that limit shareholder approval is required, unless an exemption applies.
The proposed changes
The Bill proposes to:
| repeal the existing threshold and introduce a new threshold of one year's base salary, calculated by the average amount of base salary received by the person in the last three years of service; | |
extend the scope of the termination provisions to executives including the the key management personnel and the five mostly highly remunerated officers (if different) of the entity (that is, the officers named in the remuneration report), namely a person holding ‘managerial or executive office; |
|
repeal the definition of benefit as as previously defined in s9 of the act and insert a new broader definition into section 200AB that describes a benefit as including a payment or other valuable consideration, any kind of real or personal property, any legal or equitable estate or interest in real or personal property, or any legal or equitable right. To avoid any future ambiguity relating to what amounts to a benefit that requires shareholder approval, the Bill provides for a regulation making power to create regulations which prescribe things to either be a benefit, or not to be a benefit; |
|
| prohibit an executive or their associate from voting at a general meeting of the shareholders to approve a larger benefit, unless the executive is acting as a proxy, is appointed in writing, and votes according to the principal's written instructions. |
Read the full text of the Bill here.
The proposed amendments will only affect benefits under contracts of employment that commenced, or were varied on or after the commencement date of the Bill.
Malcolm Burrows B.Bus.,MBA.,LL.B.,GDLP.,MQLS
"The information contained in this article is general in nature and cannot be regarded as anything more than general comment. Readers of this article should not act on the basis of this comment without consulting one of Rostron Carlyle's legal practitioners who will consider their particular circumstances".
Other related articles that are available in Rostron Carlyle's Corporate Law series include:
| Formal requirements for minutes of Directors' Meetings | |
| Strict compliance with the Corporations Act required for Minutes to be evidentiary (Lessons from Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 11) [2009] NSWSC 287); | |
| Introduction to Shareholders Agreements | |
| Statutory directors duties - an introduction |
Expertise
Rostron Carlyle's lawyers have a wide range of experience assisting people in all aspects of corporate law.
Not only will you find that Rostron Carlyle is likely to have assisted someone in your exact situation, but you’ll find that a Rostron Carlyle lawyer can distill a complex legal issue into a set of actionable options for you to consider.
A Rostron Carlyle lawyer will be a person that you can relate to. We'’ll talk your language. Most
importantly, a relationship with a Rostron Carlyle lawyer will be "a relationship you can rely on".








